Search for: "Bare v. Brand Energy "
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
LSU has protected the bare essentials, but not much else. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:56 am
Innovation Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
The decision is about likelihood of confusion, reputed trade marks' extended protection, and passing off.* The Naked Truth: use of BARELY THERE wasn't even barely thereAnother Irish Patents Office’s decision that Jeremy reports is HBI Branded Apparel Enterprises LLC v Dunnes Stores Ireland Company. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 11:08 am
Beastie Boys v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:04 pm
See Brand Energy & Infrastructure Services Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 5:25 am
Spire, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:06 pm
Global Brand v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 2:00 pm
In fact, a current Supreme Court case, Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 2:33 pm
“We can now concentrate all of our energies on what we do best - providing dolls and other toys that are the consumers’ first choice. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 11:10 am
., v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 6:11 am
Wallace’s Rakofsky v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 8:04 pm
Perfect Web v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 7:29 am
Read People v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm
Uniloc v. [read post]
9 Dec 2006, 4:41 pm
Scholars have offered theories of dilution, but the law is only barely congruent with, e.g., Schechter's theory. [read post]
